geneontology / project-management

Tracking project metadata in the GO as issues.
2 stars 0 forks source link

Switch to reference genome set for AmiGO, all APIs, and data products #48

Open kltm opened 1 year ago

kltm commented 1 year ago
Project link

https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/117

Project description

A potential continuation of https://github.com/geneontology/project-management/issues/82.

We'd like to:

  1. make all available all species in AmiGO and the API; this would require changes in the pipeline, mostly with scaling
  2. adding QC (currently ontobio) and GPAD output for these products
  3. do full species sorting for all data products; some adjustments to downloads and announcement

For examining scope, also see: https://github.com/geneontology/pipeline/issues/246 https://github.com/geneontology/pipeline/issues/204

PI

Chris

Project owner (PO)

Pascale

Technical lead (TL)

Seth

Other personnel (OP)

Seth, Sierra, Dustin, Patrick

Technical specs

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CU4Zp7t-wTRlcsXlMndIBr2XNUjeBxINdv-O5XPUERQ/edit

Other comments

N/A

kltm commented 1 year ago

@pgaudet Added new project; we'd also likely be using myself, Dustin, and/or Sierra.

kltm commented 1 year ago

Before digging into what we want to do, we should decide the final scope.

pgaudet commented 1 year ago

Updates& discussion on 2023-03-01 Managers call:

kltm commented 1 year ago

Following from @pgaudet, I'm going to put some running notes on things we'll need to tackle here are we figure out the exact scope of what we're tackling:

kltm commented 10 months ago

@pgaudet Talking @cmungall , maybe to better make progress with smaller incremental steps, we could unbundle the initial task of make the "142" available as GAF 2.2s.

cmungall commented 10 months ago

Proposed new scope for this project:

kltm commented 10 months ago

@pgaudet, More talk w/Chris, assuming we're all on the same page about this, I'd probably try and push through on this myself (spinning it out as a separate project first).

pgaudet commented 10 months ago

Sounds good to me.

One suggestion (if doable) would be to have 2 table, one for the MODs, and one for all others, since 142 (in fact it's now 143) species is a long list to scroll through.

Thanks, Pascale

kltm commented 10 months ago

@pgaudet @cmungall Re-scoping this as the "strong" version; the narrow version discussed above is now https://github.com/geneontology/project-management/issues/82

kltm commented 10 months ago

Moving this back to "priority", as #82 will meet some initial desirable targets and unsure if the rest is on the table immediately.