search

geneontology / protein-complex-refactor

working files specifically for members of the ontology group for the PC refactor
1 stars 0 forks source link

GO:0005581 collagen trimer #7

Open bmeldal opened 8 years ago

bmeldal commented 8 years ago

David OS and I added the functional/structural children with Sylvie (expert from MatrixDB), do we want to keep the precise types? They could become NARROW synonyms.

dosumis commented 8 years ago

David OS and I added the functional/structural children with Sylvie (expert from MatrixDB), do we want to keep the precise types?

Yes. Just push the actual trimers (e.g. collagen type VI trimer) to InTact.

bmeldal commented 8 years ago

They are already in CP. It would require a re-annotation of the IntAct complexes to the parent term and also checking for any other manual annotations. I guess it requires an obsoletion call.

dosumis commented 8 years ago

I thought the whole point of these tickets was to flag which terms would stay in GO and which would, ultimately, be obsoleted. The proposed inference mechanism would automatically classify the InTact trimers under the functional/structural classes, as long as the relevant annotations were present on the InTact terms.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Birgit notifications@github.com wrote:

They are already in CP. It would require a re-annotation of the IntAct complexes to the parent term and also checking for any other manual annotations. I guess it requires an obsoletion call.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/geneontology/protein-complex-refactor/issues/7#issuecomment-155446793 .

bmeldal commented 8 years ago

Sorry, you are right, the annotations would get migrated automatically if your plan comes off! So nothing to do right now, right?