Closed unintendedbear closed 9 years ago
Actually, I'm not sure about this... because the reviewer says " It seems a little unnecessary to include low-level details of using the Drools package (is the file extension relevant?). At the point first encountered in the paper, Figure 1 seems unnecessary. Similarly, is the actual format of Weka data files (ARFF) actually relevant? Would it not make sense to describe the data structures in a language-agnostic fashion?"
But it is necessary because the format of the data strongly forces the way of parsing... Should I specify this instead of erasing Drools reference (with its reference to bibliography)? What do you think @JJ @zeinebchelly ?
When talking about Drools in the manuscript, it is not necessary to mention its basic details so, as said Fig 1 can be omitted. For the Arff file it is not correct :) and still I think it is not necessary to give a sample of the .arff file as it is known. We can just keep the description of the arff file without the Fig. 2. What do you think?
2015-07-20 10:51 GMT+01:00 Paloma de las Cuevas Delgado < notifications@github.com>:
Actually, I'm not sure about this... because the reviewer says " It seems a little unnecessary to include low-level details of using the Drools package (is the file extension relevant?). At the point first encountered in the paper, Figure 1 seems unnecessary. Similarly, is the actual format of Weka data files (ARFF) actually relevant? Would it not make sense to describe the data structures in a language-agnostic fashion?"
But it is necessary because the format of the data strongly forces the way of parsing... Should I specify this instead of erasing Drools reference (with its reference to bibliography)? What do you think @JJ https://github.com/JJ @zeinebchelly https://github.com/zeinebchelly ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/geneura-papers/2015-CIDS/issues/19#issuecomment-122829290 .
I agree :)
When talking about Drools and Weka fiel extensions. Try to describe the data structures in a language-agnostic fashion.