Minor editions

[JJ]

Title: The capitalization should be done consistently. p. 1, l. 12: “problems” (plural). l. 14: Possibly there is not just a single pattern. p. 2, l. 7: Maybe “not decidable” is better than “impossible to know”. l. 19f: Training a neural network is not always stochastic. This should be better specified. l. 5 from below: “usual” instead of “frequent”. p. 4, l 24: Move “recently” after “proved”. p. 5,l. 5 from below: “a memory”. p. 5, l. 4ff from below: There is something missing in the sentence starting with “In order”. p. 6, l. 2: It is not the fitness of the case studies but analyzed in the case studies. l. 11: The acronym MADE has not been introduced before. p. 7, l. 7: “ships are sent”. p. 8, l. 15: “from a medium”. l. 22: “where a”. l. 34: Skip comma. l. 36: Skip comma. p. 9, l. 21 from below: “grows to infinity” instead of “is too big”. p. 10, l. 5: “quite different” instead of “away”. p. 11: First two sentences are not clear enough. p. 13, l. 6: “which” instead of “whose”. p. 14, l. 7: Why don’t you specify the considered stochastic optimization algorithm? p. 15, 6: Skip “one”. l. 8: “cases” (plural). l. 13ff: The statement stating with “At any rate” appears to be too strong and not well founded by the considered experiments. l. 19-20: Skip commas. l. 22: “it is an error” – too strong statement. p. 18, Ref. 44: Errors with the names?

[JJ]

I am leaving today for Brussels and would like to send it this morning. Will you be able to make the changes?

[fergunet]

Yes, I can. Starting now. I didn't know the deadline was so close.

El domingo, 21 de febrero de 2016, Juan Julián Merelo Guervós < notifications@github.com> escribió:

I am leaving today for Brussels and would like to send it this morning. Will you be able to make the changes?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/geneura-papers/2015-ECTA/issues/23#issuecomment-186775353 .

Dr. Pablo García Sánchez University of Granada http://www.ugr.es/~pablogarcia

[fergunet]

Before closing the issue, please @JJ check some issues to solve yet, mainly concerning rewriting stuff that is not clear for the reviewer (but that I would prefer not correct, because probably I will make it worse). My comments are in italic

• p. 5, l. 4ff from below: There is something missing in the sentence starting with “In order”. I do not know what is missing here
• p. 11: First two sentences are not clear enough. In my compiled pdf the sentences (and the ones before and after, just in case) seems clear
• p. 13, l. 6: “which” instead of “whose”. "a neural net whose fitness distribution has kurtosis of 15" seems correct to me
• l. 13ff: The statement stating with “At any rate” appears to be too strong and not well founded by the considered experiments.
• p. 18, Ref. 44: Errors with the names? The error was in the @pacastillo paper, so I fixed geneura.bib file, please update it before compiling @JJ