search

geneura-papers / 2015_books

Paper on the book publishing prediction
Artistic License 2.0
2 stars 0 forks source link

The graphical abstract (R#2, comment 5) #51

Closed pacastillo closed 8 years ago

pacastillo commented 8 years ago

We should design a graphical abstract, that is just "a single, concise, pictorial and visual summary of the main findings of the article. This could either be the concluding figure from the article or a figure that is specially designed for the purpose, which captures the content of the article for readers at a single glance."

https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/graphical-abstract

unintendedbear commented 8 years ago

Does anybody have a chart with the models performance? It may be of use.

fergunet commented 8 years ago

Excellent. I think it explains clearly ALL the paper :)

Just a minor thing: the square "Sales prediction ..." has the lower line cropped, maybe it is outside the canvas limit?

7ossam81 commented 8 years ago

Good job Paloma ! Nice illustrative figure.

JJ commented 8 years ago

:+1:

unintendedbear commented 8 years ago

Yay! Thanks, and thank you @fergunet , I was so frustrated with the pixel limits that I cropped that hehe, I will fix it!

pacastillo commented 8 years ago

very good job!!! Thank you so much!

JJ commented 8 years ago

@unintendedbear maybe you could have only one "Decision"? You can just shoot the arrow up from our model, instead of having it repeated twice

unintendedbear commented 8 years ago

Sure, no problem!

I will change that but won't close the issue, in case anybody wants to suggest more changes.

fergunet commented 8 years ago

Sorry for re-opening the issue. I think the graphical abstract is quite cool and it should be added in the introduction, as some reviewers require extra explanations (ex: The authors should clarify their main contributions in the introduction parts. (reviewer 2) ).

If you don't agree just close the issue again.

unintendedbear commented 8 years ago

In https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/graphical-abstract it says:

Authors must provide an image that clearly represents the work described in the paper. A key figure from the original paper, summarising the content can also be submitted as a graphical abstract.

So if we can use a Figure from the paper as graphical abstract... I think it's ok that we include it in the paper.

Also, remember that we can submit the graphical abstract to http://webshop.elsevier.com/illustrationservices/ImagePolishing/gap/requestForm.cfm so that they tell us if it's a good one or not.

pacastillo commented 8 years ago

As stated in: https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/graphical-abstract "The Graphical Abstract will be displayed in online search result lists, the online contents list and the online article, but will not (yet) appear in the article PDF file or print."

I understand that this figure is intended to be displayed in the web, but not inside the article pdf. What do you think?

7ossam81 commented 8 years ago

I go with Pedro. I think this figure is just to be displayed on the website of the journal not to be included.

On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Pedro A. Castillo Valdivieso < notifications@github.com> wrote:

As stated in: https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/graphical-abstract "The Graphical Abstract will be displayed in online search result lists, the online contents list and the online article, but will not (yet) appear in the article PDF file or print."

I understand that this figure is intended to be displayed in the web, but not inside the article pdf. What do you think?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geneura-papers/2015_books/issues/51#issuecomment-244619500, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQPDBCvnya3hyrDvG2kyQYYeM4sCB6XRks5qmwj3gaJpZM4Jom4R .

Hossam O.Faris, Ph.D Associate Professor Business Information Technology Department King Abdulla II School for Information Technology The University of Jordan Amman - Jordan

Office Phone: +962 6 5355000 Ext.: 22634 P.O.Box 11942, Amman - Jordan

e-mail: hossam.faris@ju.edu.jo 7ossam@gmail.com

unintendedbear commented 8 years ago

Notice the (yet) in the sentence. That means that in principle it will not appear, but that it can, of course, if it's already included in the paper.

amorag commented 8 years ago

I don't think we should include that figure in the paper,  the contribution must be written and clarified in the text,  regarding the existing SotA in these topics, and pointing out how this paper advances it. The figure would be the 'external' summary of the paper. Actually,  in my view, I think that this graphical abstract is a bit 'generic' with respect to the contents of the work.  I mean,  this shows overall the application of the obtained results (but there exist other works doing this in the same way). However I think the figure should go deeper in what's the methodology about. Thus, I would include a part in the figure describing the methodology itself, along with the used regression,  visualisation and FS techniques we have applied. What do the rest think? Cheers, Antonio El 4/9/2016 7:58 p. m., Paloma de las Cuevas Delgado notifications@github.com escribió:In https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/graphical-abstract it says:

Authors must provide an image that clearly represents the work described in the paper. A key figure from the original paper, summarising the content can also be submitted as a graphical abstract.

So if we can use a Figure from the paper as graphical abstract... I think it's ok that we include it in the paper.

Also, remember that we can submit the graphical abstract to http://webshop.elsevier.com/illustrationservices/ImagePolishing/gap/requestForm.cfm so that they tell us if it's a good one or not.

—You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

fergunet commented 8 years ago

Several points: 1) It is possible to repeat a graphical abstract and use it in the paper (in fact, I did it in my ASOCO paper) 2) I created a figure describing the methodology in [1] but I don't know if it covers all the aspects of the paper. Please, @amorag and @7ossam81 @pacastillo @unintendedbear confirm if everything is correct or if I should add something else.

[1] https://github.com/geneura-papers/2015_books/blob/master/metodologia.eps

amorag commented 8 years ago

I didn't say it couldn't be done,  but I think that we should write it clearly in the text and use it just as abstract. ;) I can't see the figure in my mobile phone. I'll check it later.  Thanks

El 4/9/2016 8:40 p. m., Pablo García Sánchez notifications@github.com escribió:Several points: 1) It is possible to repeat a graphical abstract and use it in the paper (in fact, I did it in my ASOCO paper) 2) I created a figure describing the methodology in [1] but I don't know if it covers all the aspects of the paper. Please, @amorag and @7ossam81 @pacastillo @unintendedbear confirm if everything is correct or if I should add something else.

[1] https://github.com/geneura-papers/2015_books/blob/master/metodologia.eps

—You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

amorag commented 8 years ago

In order to complement the graphical abstract, I propose the following:

To include another space in the arrow from ‘Publishing company’ to ‘Proposed LRM’ with the text ‘Feature Selection and Regression’ and two columns/blocks, one containing the tested FS methods (SOM, RelAttEval, CFSubEval) and one with the regression techniques (kNN, M5P, RF, LR, SVM, MLP, ELM).

This way we’ll show in a deeper way the contents of the paper.

Do you agree?

unintendedbear commented 8 years ago

No problem! I will try to make it fit.