To decide a proper title

[unintendedbear]

All @JJ @fergunet @zeinebchelly , please discuss here. Candidates are:

Applying genetic programming for extracting classification rules Extracting user activity classification rules via genetic programming [other]

[fergunet]

I prefer "Extracting user activity classification rules via genetic programming" because using GP for rule extraction has been used previously.

[unintendedbear]

Ok, but is it not creepy to start saying "extracting user activity"? Is like screaming BIG BROTHER HERE

[JJ]

Generally the title should have

• What you do
• How you do it
• What is new about it (including why you do it)

I miss the "why" or the "what is new" in the title. Other than that, any of them is OK

[unintendedbear]

The purpose of the paper is to decide which methodology is best for obtaining rules: classifiers, association algorithms, or GP. Does this help clarifying? :( Also, I think it's new because so far I don't know anybody who has applied GP to BYOD rule generation... And the kind of data, that is also new.

[JJ]

2016-03-29 9:36 GMT+02:00 Paloma de las Cuevas Delgado < notifications@github.com>:

The purpose of the paper is to decide which methodology is best for obtaining rules: classifiers, association algorithms, or GP. Does this help clarifying? :(

Partly, but you need to say why you need to obtain those rules. You need to frame the problem and motivate it.

Also, I think it's new because so far I don't know anybody who has applied GP to BYOD rule generation... And the kind of data, that is also new.

That is not necessarily a reason. Maybe it was not worth the while. But you need to mention the BYOD context .

[zeinebchelly]

Hi,

Would those be ok, maybe?

1. A novel BYOD security rules extraction technique based on genetic programming.
2. A novel application of genetic programming to the BYOD security context.
3. A new rules extraction technique based on genetic programming and it's application to the BYOD security context.

What do you think ?

Zaineb On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 at 09:56 Juan Julián Merelo Guervós < notifications@github.com> wrote:

2016-03-29 9:36 GMT+02:00 Paloma de las Cuevas Delgado < notifications@github.com>:

The purpose of the paper is to decide which methodology is best for obtaining rules: classifiers, association algorithms, or GP. Does this help clarifying? :(

Partly, but you need to say why you need to obtain those rules. You need to frame the problem and motivate it.

Also, I think it's new because so far I don't know anybody who has applied GP to BYOD rule generation... And the kind of data, that is also new.

That is not necessarily a reason. Maybe it was not worth the while. But you need to mention the BYOD context .

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/geneura-papers/2016-PPSN/issues/4#issuecomment-202767027

[JJ]

I'm OK with any. Maybe the first a bit better.

[unintendedbear]

I also like the three of them. thank you! I'm so bad at titles... We will have to compare the results before stating GP is the best, but I will change the title for the first one for the moment.

[JJ]

Good

2016-03-31 18:32 GMT+02:00 Paloma de las Cuevas Delgado < notifications@github.com>:

I also like the three of them. thank you! I'm so bad at titles... We will have to compare the results before stating GP is the best, but I will change the title for the first one for the moment.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/geneura-papers/2016-PPSN/issues/4#issuecomment-204011033

JJ

[zeinebchelly]

I inserted the title that I have previously proposed and agreed by @JJ and @unintendedbear.