JJ
commented
6 years ago 2018-01-19 16:02 GMT+01:00 Pablo García Sánchez notifications@github.com:
A possible example:
- Define concepts: UNCERTAINTY vs DYNAMISM etc... This has to be done BEFORE any search, hence step 0 instead 1
- Define a Scopus search. Example TITLE-ABS-KEY ( uncertainty AND optimization ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , "COMP" ) ) (althought I think it is still a bit limited, any suggestions to improve it?)
- Filter according previously defined concepts, and other decisions (date? number of citations?)
- Show data (by year, by type of publication, real problem or not, topic...)
This methodology should be explained in the paper as a complete section. Next section would be the one to include the classification/taxonomy and discussion.
This is more a bibliometrics thing and I don't know very well what to do. I have been reading the survey paper this morning and the problem is that it's ill-defined what we mean by uncertainty, being reduced to a "crisp" function with added noise. So anyway Concepts would be "noisy" "uncertainty" "optimization" "evolutionary computation" (and other related areas) and so on...
fergunet
A possible example:
0) Define concepts: UNCERTAINTY vs DYNAMISM etc... This has to be done BEFORE any search, hence step 0 instead 1 1) Define a Scopus search. Example
TITLE-ABS-KEY ( uncertainty AND optimization ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , "COMP" ) )(althought I think it is still a bit limited, any suggestions to improve it?) 2) Filter according previously defined concepts, and other decisions (date? number of citations?) 3) Show data (by year, by type of publication, real problem or not, topic...)This methodology should be explained in the paper as a complete section. Next section would be the one to include the classification/taxonomy and discussion.