Closed rbartelme closed 4 years ago
Moved to Sprint 35, and opened issue #15, instead of issue #12 output (which is cumbersome). I'll use issue #15's output to look at the network.
Fixed task list to reflect the shift in network dataset from issue #15.
Derived data links are obvious and will be blacklisted for the full run (i.e. min/max/mean by day)
NA's led to spurious network from the tall to wide format conversion.
by Ryan Bartelme, PhD - June 4th, 2020
First attempts at automated learning were with mixed results.
It's probably best to think about the biology and physics of the system, and hardcode a graph structure. Then it will be easier to fit the raw data to the graph structure and see what the probabilities are at each node.
It may be best to actually link derived data
Important to link static properties of the system
Cultivars are not moving, they are statically linked to their location
Canopy height is linked to vapor pressure deficit (Poor, 2019)
min/max/daily mean are linked...but maybe choosing the mean value would be best?
The data are ordinal, that is important to specify - maybe it's important to make the time connection now?
Continuing with results from issue #15: