sshfs help: umask option could be better described

gensrjh / macfuse

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/macfuse

Other

1 stars 0 forks source link

sshfs help: umask option could be better described #256

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Re http://groups.google.com/group/MacFusion-devel/msg/ea556ad3763e7d03 

> -o umask=M             set file permissions (octal) 

A more focused description might be 

> set file mode creation mask

Original issue reported on code.google.com by grahampe...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2007 at 4:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

sshfs isn't part of "MacFUSE Core", so unless something doesn't work correctly 
on Mac OS X, I wouldn't usually 
want to increase the size of the patch I apply to the original sshfs source. 
Your "better described" suggestion is 
platform-independent in this case, so the more appropriate place to make this 
suggestion is the sshfs project.

Original comment by si...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2007 at 7:30

Changed state: WontFix

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Thanks. 

Re <http://fuse.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/SshfsFaq> I have e-mailed the 
report to fuse-
sshfs@lists.sourceforge.net with a blind cc to the original reporter.

Original comment by grahampe...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2007 at 12:43