Closed JanHasenauer closed 7 years ago
These are COMBOS models, and the difference in the COMBOS versions of Thyroid1 and Thyroid2 is the initial conditions. This difference has somehow been lost in the GenSSI version. I will correct that.
Tom (Dr. Thomas S. Ligon) Tom@thomassligon.infomailto:Tom@thomassligon.info Frohnloher Str. 6a 81475 Muenchen Germany Tel. +49(89)74575075
From: JanHasenauer [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 11:40 PM To: genssi-developer/GenSSI GenSSI@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: [genssi-developer/GenSSI] Thyroid1 and Thyroid2 identical (#6)
I did not find a difference between Thyroid1 and Thyroid2. What is the difference?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/genssi-developer/GenSSI/issues/6, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APFQXxr-EplekJn_P0NYHc2dklc44RUIks5shajJgaJpZM4PTzt2.
In COMBOS, Thyroid1 has no initial conditions, and Thyroid2 has all zeros. In GenSSI we have model.sym.x0=[0 0 0] for both models. Question: Is it possible to define empty initial conditions in AMICI/GenSSI? I tried setting model.sym.x0=[] and the result is not good, i.e. no Lie derivatives, no tableaus. Should we add a check in genssiCheckModel?
I think that GenSSI needs conceptually initial conditions. We should however get the same results if we set the initial conditions in GenSSI to unknown parameters and perform the structural identifiability analysis only with respect to the kinetic parameters.
I see that Thyroid1 now has three new parameters, x10, x20, and x30, but they are not used, and x0 is still all zeros.
Closed unintentionally.
ah, good point. i included them in x0. now it should be fine.
I did not find a difference between Thyroid1 and Thyroid2. What is the difference?