geoadmin / mf-geoadmin3

Legacy source code of map.geo.admin.ch
https://map.geo.admin.ch
Other
227 stars 72 forks source link

[aviation] placement of data status in WMS-layer ch.bazl.luftfahrthindernis #1800

Closed mariokeusen closed 9 years ago

mariokeusen commented 9 years ago

UC: the data status in the WMS-layer ch.bazl.luftfahrthindernis is always visible Result: in Mf-geoadmin3.dev.bgdi.ch/?topic=aviation, the data status is currently hidden behind the mapviewer's header Expected: the data status is visible like in http://map.bazl.admin.ch aviation_lfh_datastatus

Remark: Placement is ok on a printed PDF: aviation_lfh_datastatus_print

ltclm commented 9 years ago

Hi Mario The placement of the data status is relative to the extent of the getmap extent, it has been optimized for map.bazl.admin.ch. In map.geo.admin.ch the uppermost part of the getmap is hidden behind the fancy header. The same layer, provided by wms-bgdi, cannot be optimized for map.bazl.admin.ch and map.geo.admin.ch. We have several options:

Both options have to be discussed with the customer.

mariokeusen commented 9 years ago

Hi Marcel, I'd prefer the second option. But we'll discuss this with the customer in the meeting next week.

mariokeusen commented 9 years ago

Decision has been taken with the customer: we'll realize Marcel's option 2 (on the bottom of the mapwindow). We'll do that, as soon as the new topic will be ready to go on prod.

davidoesch commented 9 years ago

@mariokeusen @ltclm for the sacke of coherence with \ltfs01.lt.admin.ch\dep\5-kogis\5-KOGIS\51-BGDI\5103-Geobasisdaten\5103-04-Originaldaten\5103-04-09-bund-swisstopo\Zeitreise\Zeitreise_filmersatz_RE3.pptx

-for the viewer: try to have it in the layername as well as in time compare feature eg http://mf-geoadmin3.dev.bgdi.ch/dev_timestamp2/?X=164944.36&Y=621295.11&zoom=5&lang=de&topic=dev&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-grau&catalogNodes=9900&layers_timestamp=19881231,19041231&layers=ch.swisstopo.zeitreihen,ch.swisstopo.zeitreihen

ltclm commented 9 years ago

@daguer already changed the snippet, the new positioned label is on prod now.