Closed patricoferris closed 2 years ago
@patricoferris I would love to give this a shot... Please assign it to me....
Hi @patricoferris is the value of the id going to come from the Json section or a randomly generated number?
The id
field will be parsed from the JSON if it exists :))
Hi @imajinarts, I just worked on a similar issue. If you are having problems, please don't hesitate to reach out to me. I want to see you make your first PR 😊 You've got this 💪💪
@streetCoderr I'll really appreciate the explanation.... Hopefully it'll tie with what I already have and I'll soon open the PR
Hello @streetCoderr and @imajinarts @patricoferris ,
I could use some help here. Do I need to have a contributing project assigned to me or I can take up any project to contribute to?
Thanks
@streetCoderr I'll really appreciate the explanation.... Hopefully it'll tie with what I already have and I'll soon open the PR
Alright @imajinarts. Well done.
Hello @streetCoderr and @imajinarts @patricoferris ,
I could use some help here. Do I need to have a contributing project assigned to me or I can take up any project to contribute to?
Thanks
Hi @Techbae22 If you see any issue that no one is working on, you can ask our mentor @patricoferris to assign the task to you. He will attend to you when he comes online
@Techbae22 thanks and put mentor @patricoferris has the right to decide meanwhile feel free to throw in light on any issue... It is indeed open source and so collaboration is better
Thanks everyone
From the RFC we have that:
For example:
And currently we would just drop this field entirely:
https://github.com/geocaml/ocaml-geojson/blob/9eaaa54fa433bf732069e3e4623f9fd29c38b754/src/geojson/geojson.ml#L268
This is somewhat relevant to #20 as both will probably end up changing the type of
Feature.t
so there may be a bit of massaging needed for the PR to fix this, but that's okay.