Closed dianashk closed 9 years ago
Hi @dianashk and thanks for the PR :) Sorry for the lag, I was travelling.
need spec revision number
Good point!
need license so everyone is comfortable adopting the spec
Good point! I would go for CC0, what do you think?
move Feature address parts into address scope
Do you mean we should have both address
namespace, and geocoding
as discussed in #4 ?
geocoding
and address
namespaces. Just did the pull request off master
in case your other branch was going to change still.Can you split the address suggestion from the other two changes? so we can merge those, while we need a bit more discussion to get consensus around address
namespace ;)
Done. :grinning:
:)
@dianashk can you also create another PR or issue about adding address
namespace, so we can continue the discussion?
Feature
address parts intoaddress
scope