geocoders / geocodejson-spec

DRAFT An attempt to have standard geojson responses from geocoders.
37 stars 10 forks source link

Suggestions #8

Closed dianashk closed 9 years ago

dianashk commented 9 years ago
yohanboniface commented 9 years ago

Hi @dianashk and thanks for the PR :) Sorry for the lag, I was travelling.

need spec revision number

Good point!

need license so everyone is comfortable adopting the spec

Good point! I would go for CC0, what do you think?

move Feature address parts into address scope

Do you mean we should have both address namespace, and geocoding as discussed in #4 ?

dianashk commented 9 years ago
yohanboniface commented 9 years ago

Can you split the address suggestion from the other two changes? so we can merge those, while we need a bit more discussion to get consensus around address namespace ;)

dianashk commented 9 years ago

Done. :grinning:

yohanboniface commented 9 years ago

:)

yohanboniface commented 9 years ago

@dianashk can you also create another PR or issue about adding address namespace, so we can continue the discussion?