Closed Robinlovelace closed 11 months ago
Another option could be to go back to the command line gdal_contour
for the contour example, and accordingly to use command line gdaldem
for the slope and aspect examples. These don't have to be evaluated I guess, we could say that it is for the reader to explore in case they need these and other operations that are easier done using GDAL than in Python.
Hi @Robinlovelace , thanks for this, it's a good option, however I suggest to use
osgeo.gdal
for this, such as here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47653271/calculating-aspect-slope-in-python3-x-matlab-gradientm-function which is already used in the contour example in chapter 5. Will be happy to hear what you think
Sounds like a good plan :+1:
gdal_contour
and other GDAL options also sound good to me, whichever works best for you. I think there are some bits of this PR that may be worth keeping, notably the de-emphasizing of richdem so feel free to checkout this PR and make additional changes.
Alternatively, I can update this PR so it makes no change to the Python code by lays the foundations for a future change. Would that be useful?
gdal_contour
and other GDAL options also sound good to me, whichever works best for you. I think there are some bits of this PR that may be worth keeping, notably the de-emphasizing of richdem so feel free to checkout this PR and make additional changes.Alternatively, I can update this PR so it makes no change to the Python code by lays the foundations for a future change. Would that be useful?
Sure, thanks! I've merged and then will edit the code parts
Sounds like a plan and didn't think of that third option which in hindsight was best: merge + edit!
Hi @Robinlovelace , thanks for this, it's a good option, however I suggest to use
osgeo.gdal
for this, such as here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47653271/calculating-aspect-slope-in-python3-x-matlab-gradientm-function which is already used in the contour example in chapter 5. Will be happy to hear what you think