Open nicholas512 opened 4 years ago
Option 3 has been unanimously (n=1) chosen as the preferred solution.
For each direction from 000
to 359
:
INSERT INTO sensors(device_id,
label,
type_of_measurement,
unit_of_measurement,
accuracy,
precision,
height_in_metres)
VALUES ('5265f740-8e09-4d41-b5b6-2136f5d35ea3',
'horizon_angle_at_000_true',
'numeric',
'degrees',
1,
1,
0);
If done after migration to devices_sensors
link table then
INSERT INTO sensors(device_id,
label,
type_of_measurement,
unit_of_measurement,
accuracy,
precision,
height_in_metres)
VALUES ('5265f740-8e09-4d41-b5b6-2136f5d35ea3',
'horizon_angle_at_000_true',
'numeric',
'degrees',
1,
1,
0)
RETURNING id as new_id
INSERT INTO devices_sensors (timestamp,
device_id,
sensor_id)
VALUES (make_timestamptz(1900, 1, 1, 00, 00, 00, 'UTC')
'5265f740-8e09-4d41-b5b6-2136f5d35ea3',
new_id);
RE: using a 'horizon cam' device, this might complicate things, but could be added later and could also have the device_type of 'human observation' (so we would have multiple devices with human observation as their type). Queries for human observation would have to be by device_type and not by id
serial_number = null
access_code = null
device_type = human observation
manufacturer =
manufacturer_device_name = horizon camera? quickhorizon?
acquired_on = whenever it was acquired
notes = actually have some details here
BC16-RV13_HOR_5211.txt This horizon file is for site BC16-RV13_03
the key problem is that horizon points are tuples (x,y) but an observation is a singleton (except for depth max/min info that can be added).
Suggested solutions are below (# 3 is my favorite).
suggested solution 1
create new locations for horizon measurements that are lines instead of points, the azimuth of the line then corresponds to the azimuth of the horizon
advantages: not many disadvantages: separates observations into many different locations, when they represent the same location. Convention is somewhat ad-hoc; would require good documentation. Creates many locations that are only used for one purpose, stores information about the observation (i.e. the azimuth) in the location description
suggested solution 2
implement an ad-hoc convention: e.g.
advantages: data can be stored easily, all observation data is kept in the observations table disadvantages: does not fit into conceptual schema. Would need to be documented and followed.
suggested solution 3:
discretize azimuthal directions into different sensors e.g.
{"device_id":"horizon_at_000", ..., }, {"device_id":"horizon_at_005", ..., }, …, {"device_id":"horizon_at_355", ..., }
All horizon sensors could be grouped as a single device (e.g. horizon camera/quickhorizon) (instead of human observation)advantages: fits well into conceptual schema disadvantages: restricts the data that can be entered. Creates a lot of sensors that are basically the same, stores information about the observation (i.e. the azimuth) in the sensor description