Closed stackTom closed 3 years ago
Hmmm.... I don't think so. I find it important to see the actual frame coverage. Don't you think that https://github.com/geodesymiami/insarmaps/issues/27 would address this?
There is also lots of data sets which are not really needed. I have to clean up. Now that we have the copy
button in the frame list window it is easy to remove.
That reminds me. The copy button looks a bit weired and is not properly placed. It would be preferred if it shows up only when you hover over the granule name. It als needs some space between the granul name and the button.
Yes, https://github.com/geodesymiami/insarmaps/issues/27 might address this.
Regarding issues with the copy button. Can you open a new issue with all the details? Also, I am closing down this one. Will reopen in case https://github.com/geodesymiami/insarmaps/issues/27 doesn't help.
We have a lot of data frame rectangles drawn now because we have many datasets. I have noticed some slowness while panning and zooming the map in and out. It only goes away once I am zoomed in enough and the map is rendering less data frames. I suppose mapbox is not every efficient at drawing these dataframe triangles. Should we consider clustering them like this: https://docs.mapbox.com/mapbox-gl-js/example/cluster/?