Open falkamelung opened 2 years ago
I reversed the geolocation correction to see how it looks before applying the correction
correct_geolocation.py --geometry inputs/geometryRadar.h5 --demErr demErr.h5 --reverse
save_hdfeos5.py timeseries_demErr.h5 --tc temporalCoherence.h5 --asc avgSpatialCoh.h5 -m ../maskPS.h5 -g inputs/geometryRadar.h5 -t smallbaselineApp.cfg --suffix nocorrected_PS
h5file=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_nocorrected_PS.he5
rm -rf JSON ; hdfeos5_2json_mbtiles.py $h5file ./JSON --num-workers 8
json_mbtiles2insarmaps.py -u insaradmin -p Insar123 --host insarmaps.miami.edu -P rsmastest -U rsmas\@gmail.com --json_folder JSON --mbtiles_file JSON/${h5file%.*}.mbtiles --num-workers 8
Rerun using Sara's parameters (except unwrap error correction) https://insarmaps.miami.edu/start/25.8774/-80.1212/17.3884?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_N25828_N25919_W080181_W080102_notcorrectedPS&minScale=-0.6&maxScale=0.6
noGeolocationCorrectedCorrected | Corrected |
---|---|
Using a sequential network with 3 connection we get the same results.
Sara | Falk Sequential 3 |
---|---|
http://129.213.120.104/start/25.8781/-80.1209/17.7041?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_SM_PS&minScale=-1&maxScale=1 | Sara | Falk Sequential 3 | Falk Single Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Falk Sequential 3 Oct | |||
2016_2022 11 https://insarmaps.miami.edu/start/25.8777/-80.1209/17.2316?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20160412_20221119_N25838_N25909_W080147_W080117_Seq3PS&minScale=-1&maxScale=1 https://insarmaps.miami.edu/start/25.8777/-80.1209/17.2316?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20160412_20221119_N25838_N25909_W080147_W080117_PS&minScale=-1&maxScale=1
Falk Sequential 3 | Falk single reference |
---|---|
2016_2021 11 https://insarmaps.miami.edu/start/25.8777/-80.1209/17.2316?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20160412_20211112_N25838_N25909_W080147_W080117_Seq3PS&minScale=-1&maxScale=1 https://insarmaps.miami.edu/start/25.8777/-80.1209/17.2316?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20160412_20211112_N25838_N25909_W080147_W080117_PS&minScale=-1&maxScale=1
Falk Sequential 3 | Falk single reference |
---|---|
S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20160412_20211112_N25838_N25909_W080147_W080117_Seq3PS
S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20160412_20221119_N25838_N25909_W080147_W080117_Seq3PS
https://insarmaps.miami.edu/start/25.8786/-80.1206/17.2452?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_SaraPS&minScale=-0.6&maxScale=0.6 https://insarmaps.miami.edu/start/25.8786/-80.1206/17.2452?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_noExcludeDatesPS&minScale=-0.6&maxScale=0.6 https://insarmaps.miami.edu/start/25.8786/-80.1206/17.2452?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_noERA5PS&minScale=-0.6&maxScale=0.6
Sara's paper | noExcludeDates | noERA5 |
---|---|---|
Why does excluding two dates has such a string effect ? (`mintpy.topographicResidual.excludeDate = 20161015,20191006') They don't seem to be particularly noisy https://insarmaps.miami.edu/start/25.8786/-80.1206/17.2452?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_SimplePS&minScale=-0.6&maxScale=0.6
Copy:
Sara's paper | noExcludeDates |
---|---|
### Comparison Sara submitted versus example on GitHub Oceana: (local reference)
http://129.213.120.104/start/25.8957/-80.1218/17.4567?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_SM_PS&pointLat=25.89489&pointLon=-80.12309&refPointLat=25.89641&refPointLon=-80.12297&minScale=-0.6&maxScale=0.6&startDate=20150921&endDate=20211112 http://129.213.120.104/start/25.8957/-80.1218/17.4567?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_SaraPS&pointLat=25.89489&pointLon=-80.12309&refPointLat=25.89641&refPointLon=-80.12297&minScale=-0.6&maxScale=0.6&startDate=20150921&endDate=20211112
Submitted (SM_PS) | Github example |
---|---|
St Regis: (local reference)
Fendi (local reference)
Hi @mirzaees , I have difficulty to reproduce your Miami results. Any Idea?
The pixel that Sara and Falk are getting are nearly identical (the differences in velocities could be a consequence of a different reference point??), however the geolocations are different. What could be the reason? Am I doing the geolocation correction right?
Falk: (*template file below) http://129.213.120.104/start/25.8789/-80.1189/16.5978?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_PS&minScale=-0.6&maxScale=0.6
Sara's paper: http://129.213.120.104/start/25.8789/-80.1189/16.5978?flyToDatasetCenter=false&startDataset=S1_IW3_048_0081_0082_20150921_20211112_SM_PS&minScale=-0.6&maxScale=0.6
Sara's pixel look like in the paper. So insarmaps seems to work fine. But the pixel locations are off.
I ran the geolocation correction using
And then created the S1 file using: