Closed bangerth closed 3 weeks ago
This is not consistent with deal.II so I would prefer to keep dim
as int
. Compilers agree. :-)
I do think it would make sense to change, but I agree that it would probably be a good idea to coordinate with dealii, given that there is a lot of overlap in the used types. Or is this not a problem?
Let me close this before anyone else thinks that was a serious proposal :-)
I was asked why
dim
issigned
. There is no good answer, and generally I'm of the opinion that we should not carry around past stuff just because. So let's fix this.