It seems that #5836 changed the produced binaries from aspect and aspect-release to aspect.debug and aspect.release. I am not sure it it a great idea to change the - to a .. Thoughts?
At least, scripts and documentation would also need to reflect this:
> git grep "aspect-release"
contrib/docker/docker/Dockerfile: ln -s $Aspect_DIR/bin/aspect-release $Aspect_DIR/aspect-release
doc/sphinx/user/extending/benchmarking-run-time.md:This program can be installed with [cargo](https://crates.io/) (see Install Cargo button), with `cargo install cbdr`. To generate the run data, the program is run with `cbdr sample --timeout=900s main:/path/to/build-main/aspect-release /path/to/test.prm features:/path/to/build-feature/aspect-release /path/to/test.prm > results.csv`. This command runs both the main and feature branch executable to "warm up" and then it keeps randomly selection one of the two executables and write the timings out to `results.csv` until the timer reaches 900 seconds.
doc/sphinx/user/install/docker-container/running-models.md: `aspect` and `aspect-release`. For a discussion of the different
doc/sphinx/user/install/docker-container/running-models.md: then run `aspect-release` for a faster model run.
doc/sphinx/user/install/local-installation/compiling.md:directory and will be named `aspect` or `aspect-release`.
doc/sphinx/user/install/virtual-machine/running-models.md: ~/aspect/build/aspect-release your_input_file.prm
doc/sphinx/user/install/virtual-machine/running-models.md: You can replace `aspect-release` with `aspect-debug` to run in debug mode instead.
doc/sphinx/user/run-aspect/debug-mode.md:and `aspect-release` corresponding to a debug build and a release build, respectively.
It seems that #5836 changed the produced binaries from
aspect
andaspect-release
toaspect.debug
andaspect.release
. I am not sure it it a great idea to change the-
to a.
. Thoughts?At least, scripts and documentation would also need to reflect this: