Closed danieldouglas92 closed 1 week ago
@gassmoeller Thanks for the review, and I think you're right, at some point this could be a situation that someone may want to deal with. I think we actually may have had this exact same conversation when I made this postprocessor originally 😅, I'll close this PR.
While testing some models I saw that the darcy velocity postprocessor works even when you are not advecting a field with the
darcy field
advection method, which seems a little pointless to me. This PR just adds an assert to ensure that theporosity
field is actually advected with thedarcy field
advection method.