geogil / sawbuck

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/sawbuck
0 stars 0 forks source link

Allow registering provider bit masks #12

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
As-is, Sawbuck will pass an enable mask of 0xFFFFFFFF for every provider 
enabled. It would make sense to allow setting the enable bit mask per 
provider, which would allow using enable mask bits to control additional 
features to stack trace capture or to define finer grained facilities.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by si...@google.com on 14 Feb 2010 at 11:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by si...@google.com on 21 May 2010 at 5:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by si...@google.com on 25 May 2010 at 6:01