geojson / draft-geojson

The GeoJSON Internet-Draft
Other
197 stars 35 forks source link

Assorted corrections #208

Closed tschaub closed 8 years ago

tschaub commented 8 years ago

This addresses comments from Meral Shirazipour, Gen-ART reviewer:

Nits/editorial comments: -[Page 3], "any thing"--typo-->"anything"

d5b8ebf83fe6d449e1541815b289694746762c59

-[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?)

120ad518c71d42935ff3dc36332425e2fdf23fd0

-[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference RFC5139.

3dbe6069ce59f7cd17b592c605093ef72a3c84a7

-[Page 11], it says "Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location uncertainty and confidence might treat ... " Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not treat..."? If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..."

I didn't change anything here. I agree this paragraph adds confusion. I think the section on Uncertainty and Confidence would be clearer if we removed it.

-[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case"

b92cbfee74da0d675111e645562f612141f9b1ae (there were three of the same typo)

-[Page 12], "the OGC's "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84" [OGCURL]. " Should the URL be moved to reference section?

As this is a URN, I don't think it is appropriate for the reference section (it doesn't resolve to anything useful).

Excuse me. That is not a URN. @dr-shorthair is that expected to resolve to the "Failed resolving http://www.opengis.netcrs/OGC/1.3/CRS84" document (see also #29)?

-[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have"

3d9ca4b945ea11bafc28b8aa537ca816204dea2e

-[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics"

b92cbfee74da0d675111e645562f612141f9b1ae

-[Page 18], "can not be"---->"cannot be"

4753d5040a56351e02a8af47c433351eb2e81ad7

martinthomson commented 8 years ago

Amazing how all those double words avoided detection. LGTM.