-[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?)
120ad518c71d42935ff3dc36332425e2fdf23fd0
-[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference RFC5139.
3dbe6069ce59f7cd17b592c605093ef72a3c84a7
-[Page 11], it says
"Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location
uncertainty and confidence might treat ...
"
Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not treat..."? If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..."
I didn't change anything here. I agree this paragraph adds confusion. I think the section on Uncertainty and Confidence would be clearer if we removed it.
-[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case"
b92cbfee74da0d675111e645562f612141f9b1ae (there were three of the same typo)
As this is a URN, I don't think it is appropriate for the reference section (it doesn't resolve to anything useful).
Excuse me. That is not a URN. @dr-shorthair is that expected to resolve to the "Failed resolving http://www.opengis.netcrs/OGC/1.3/CRS84" document (see also #29)?
-[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have"
3d9ca4b945ea11bafc28b8aa537ca816204dea2e
-[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics"
This addresses comments from Meral Shirazipour, Gen-ART reviewer:
d5b8ebf83fe6d449e1541815b289694746762c59
120ad518c71d42935ff3dc36332425e2fdf23fd0
3dbe6069ce59f7cd17b592c605093ef72a3c84a7
I didn't change anything here. I agree this paragraph adds confusion. I think the section on Uncertainty and Confidence would be clearer if we removed it.
b92cbfee74da0d675111e645562f612141f9b1ae (there were three of the same typo)
As this is a URN, I don't think it is appropriate for the reference section (it doesn't resolve to anything useful).Excuse me. That is not a URN. @dr-shorthair is that expected to resolve to the "Failed resolving http://www.opengis.netcrs/OGC/1.3/CRS84" document (see also #29)?
3d9ca4b945ea11bafc28b8aa537ca816204dea2e
b92cbfee74da0d675111e645562f612141f9b1ae
4753d5040a56351e02a8af47c433351eb2e81ad7