Closed sgillies closed 9 years ago
Great. Rights granted.
(I missed this when it first went by.)
Technically speaking, CC-By requires anyone who uses rights like the ones granted here to do so only if the user is doing so in line with CC license, which means that they'd need to display attribution in the form preferred by the copyright holder. The IETF grant does not maintain this responsibility.
I highly doubt that any copyright holder is likely to object to granting these rights, but it's not clear to me that CC-By is actually sufficient; that said, I think given the silence of the other authors on this front, it's reasonable to grant these rights to the trust in any case.
(My reading of CC-By may be wrong here, but that's how I'd read it.)
@crschmidt thank you! I'll report back as soon as I hear from Mary Barnes. It may be that attribution is a blocker. If so, I take it that you would not be opposed to waiving it for the IETF Trust?
thanks for following-up with these issues. i hope once this is resolved, we can get to the fun part of the whole exercise!
The IETF needs some rights to GeoJSON. The way this works is that we grant rights to the IETF Trust and the Trust then grants them to the IETF. Which rights? See RFC 5378 sec 5.3:
My interpretation of the CC-Attribution license on the GeoJSON spec is that the rights above are already granted. Does anyone disagree?
/cc @metazool @geojson/owners @geojson/contributors