TC211 Geolexica config has both tagline and description defined as follows:
tagline: >-
The authoritative
geographic information terminology database
description: >-
The authoritative glossary for geographic information technology from ISO/TC 211.
Tagline is unused whereas description is used on all pages as the last dash-separated segment in <title> HTML element. For example, on /index.html page:
<title>
Index — The authoritative glossary for geographic information technology from ISO/TC 211.
</title>
IEV site
IEV config also has both tagline and description defined as follows:
tagline: "Electropedia: The World's Online Electrotechnical Vocabulary"
description: >-
Electropedia is produced by the IEC, the world’s leading organization that prepares and publishes International Standards for all electrical, electronic and related technologies – collectively known as “electrotechnology”. Electropedia (also known as the "IEV Online") contains all the terms and definitions in the International Electrotechnical Vocabulary or IEV which is published also as a set of publications in the IEC 60050 series that can be ordered separately from the IEC webstore.
Their usage is different though. Tagline is used in <title> elements whereas description is used in <meta name="description"> elements.
Which one is correct?
Existence of 9d280ce998c0aebea5f93025745284ed523bd64f commit (for IEV site only) suggests that the IEV is correct whereas TC211 is buggy. Nevertheless, I need confirmation.
Clarification is needed.
TC211 site
TC211 Geolexica config has both
tagline
anddescription
defined as follows:Tagline is unused whereas description is used on all pages as the last dash-separated segment in
<title>
HTML element. For example, on/index.html
page:IEV site
IEV config also has both
tagline
anddescription
defined as follows:Their usage is different though. Tagline is used in
<title>
elements whereas description is used in<meta name="description">
elements.Which one is correct?
Existence of 9d280ce998c0aebea5f93025745284ed523bd64f commit (for IEV site only) suggests that the IEV is correct whereas TC211 is buggy. Nevertheless, I need confirmation.