Closed smrgeoinfo closed 4 years ago
The lithology vocabulary pull request has been temporarily removed for some ttl format remediation. It is being put through a process to improve interoperability and validate some skos rules that were omitted in the initial build. We will re-submit a pull request to go through our approval process in the near future in conjunction with a mineral vocabulary.
Thanks. I'd be very interested in seeing the Lith vocabulary as soon as you're ready to share-- I"m working on ontology for the Loop3D project. Currently we've incorporated CGI Simple lithology, with a couple extensions for massive sulphide and altered rocks.
Likely of interest:
@nicholascar I like VocPrez-- first time I've seen it. Nice for the simple lith vocab.
The lith qualifiers vocab is kind of scary-- convolves all kinds of different properties that in GeoSciML and the GKO ontology are represented in different ways....
Stephen, I have been using Loop a bit. An ontology project sounds interesting.
Nicholas, also, thank you!
Vance, this is all looking really good, too.
This is a rock type + vocabulary. i.e. it includes some common lithological logging observation types that are not rock types unto themselves e.g. core loss
I'm trying to find the vocabulary referenced in https://github.com/geological-survey-of-queensland/vocabularies/pull/205 , but can't find it. I'd like to take a look and see how it fits with GIC and other lithology vocabs I'm workign with...