Right now, our cincy::tract_*_*() functions return the census tract identifier as tract_fips. Should we harmonize this with other instances where we use census tract identifier column names?
hh_acs_measures uses census_tract_id and census_tract_vintage
Right now, our
cincy::tract_*_*()
functions return the census tract identifier astract_fips
. Should we harmonize this with other instances where we use census tract identifier column names?hh_acs_measures
usescensus_tract_id
andcensus_tract_vintage
dep_index
usescensus_tract_fips
degauss-org/census_block_group
usescensus_tract_id_2010
,census_tract_id_2020
degauss-org/st_census_tract
usescensus_tract_id
andcensus_tract_vintage
columns