search

geophysics / mtpy

collection of python tools for standard MT data processing
GNU General Public License v3.0
32 stars 32 forks source link

New Occam2D module #23

Open geophysics opened 11 years ago

geophysics commented 11 years ago

I have just updated the Occam2D module with the new class structure. However, much functionality is still missing compared to the old occamtools (moved to legacy directory). Any issues with the old occam functionalities, or can I just try to mimic them in the newer style? Esp. the masking of points....??

kujaku11 commented 11 years ago

I think the old functionality should work fine, might have to change some variable names or variable structures depending on how you read in the data and model files.

Cheers

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Geophysics Adelaide < notifications@github.com> wrote:

I have just updated the Occam2D module with the new class structure. However, much functionality is still missing compared to the old occamtools (moved to legacy directory). Any issues with the old occam functionalities, or can I just try to mimic them in the newer style? Esp. the masking of points....??

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geophysics/mtpy/issues/23 .

alkirkby commented 11 years ago

My only suggestion would be the ability to write out a text file or something to say which points have been masked, and the ability to use the masking defined for one particular set of edis and apply the same masking to later inversions (through a “masking file” or something). Unless this is functionality is already there somewhere?

From: JP [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, 4 October 2013 9:24 AM To: geophysics/mtpy Subject: Re: [mtpy] New Occam2D module (#23)

I think the old functionality should work fine, might have to change some variable names or variable structures depending on how you read in the data and model files.

Cheers

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Geophysics Adelaide < notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

I have just updated the Occam2D module with the new class structure. However, much functionality is still missing compared to the old occamtools (moved to legacy directory). Any issues with the old occam functionalities, or can I just try to mimic them in the newer style? Esp. the masking of points....??

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geophysics/mtpy/issues/23 .

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geophysics/mtpy/issues/23#issuecomment-25666667.

kujaku11 commented 11 years ago

Fair enough that is not currently implemented. I think the easiest way would be a binary flag in a separate data file that is similar in structure to the occam data file so an entry would be something like, I'm not sure if the occam fortran code could handle this file type or not, or we could implement it in fortran so we wouldn't have to create another data file

SITE FREQ TYPE DATUM ERROR MASK 1 1 1 1.05 .0432 0 #masked 2 1 1 1.05 .0432 1 #unmasked

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:27 PM, alkirkby notifications@github.com wrote:

My only suggestion would be the ability to write out a text file or something to say which points have been masked, and the ability to use the masking defined for one particular set of edis and apply the same masking to later inversions (through a “masking file” or something). Unless this is functionality is already there somewhere?

From: JP [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, 4 October 2013 9:24 AM To: geophysics/mtpy Subject: Re: [mtpy] New Occam2D module (#23)

I think the old functionality should work fine, might have to change some variable names or variable structures depending on how you read in the data and model files.

Cheers

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Geophysics Adelaide < notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

I have just updated the Occam2D module with the new class structure. However, much functionality is still missing compared to the old occamtools (moved to legacy directory). Any issues with the old occam functionalities, or can I just try to mimic them in the newer style? Esp. the masking of points....??

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/geophysics/mtpy/issues/23> .

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/geophysics/mtpy/issues/23#issuecomment-25666667>.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geophysics/mtpy/issues/23#issuecomment-25666831 .