Group options in patent trends chart's dropdown

[brianlove]

Organize the various options in the dropdown menu controlling the patent trends chart to group related options together and remove other (non-charted) options.

Closes #337, closes #357

[github-actions[bot]]

No need for rebasing :+1: behind_count is 0 ahead_count is 1

[github-actions[bot]]

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines	Covered	Coverage	Threshold	Status
594	423	71%	0%	🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

No covered modified files...

updated for commit: 78c516e by action🐍

[github-actions[bot]]

JavaScript Coverage

Summary

Lines	Statements	Branches	Functions
	67.45% (398/590)	54.18% (207/382)	68.1% (126/185)

Modified Files • (67%)

File	% Stmts	% Branch	% Funcs	% Lines	Uncovered Line #s
All files	67.45	54.18	68.1	67.2
components	64.17	54.36	62.59	63.72
DetailViewPatents.jsx	0	0	0	0	15–216

[brianlove]

I don't think the Microsoft in [Robotics, Document Management & Publishing, Military] cases you mentioned are consistent with #357. In that issue, the problem is that there are no underlying data (counts is an empty array), so the x-axis shows the interval [-1, 6] (likely a Plotly default). In these cases, however, the data are present (via the group's counts value in overall_data.json), they are just extremely low (mostly zeros for the y-axis, with one year reaching 1). The x-axis, however, for these cases still have the correct years displayed (2013-2023).

We may want to handle low-data categories like these differently, but I think that's an analytic question to resolve, not a technical issue with the current state of the app.

[jmelot]

Ah ok got it, I misread that issue. I'll ping Zach about what to do about subfields without patent data