Expansion of Warp API bindings

[metasim]

• [X] I agree to follow the project's code of conduct.

• [ ] I added an entry to CHANGES.md if knowledge of this change could be valuable to users.

• [x] Extract replicated methods in *Options types into macros.

• [ ] Figure out why warp::tests::test_create_reproject fails on GDAL < 3.4 due to statistics seemingly not respecting no-data values.

[lnicola]

Looks pretty good, but I only checked the first two commits.

[lnicola]

I do wonder, though, if we shouldn't go straight for GDALWarp. It's not that much harder to use, and I think that mailing list reply suggested that it's the most powerful API.

[metasim]

I do wonder, though, if we shouldn't go straight for GDALWarp. It's not that much harder to use, and I think that mailing list reply suggested that it's the most powerful API.

Good point. I'll research. At first glance it looked like it required a bunch more work, but maybe I jumped to conclusions there.

[lnicola]

It's a lot of work to write the bindings for, it's similar to gdaldem.