Added `no_data_value_u64`, `set_no_data_value_u64`, `no_data_value_i64` and `set_no_data_value_i64` to `RasterBand`

[metasim]

• [X] I agree to follow the project's code of conduct.

• [X] I added an entry to CHANGES.md if knowledge of this change could be valuable to users.

Adds RasterBand::no_data_value_u64 and RasterBand::no_data_value_i64, etc.

[lnicola]

Can you resample those to 1x1 and maybe merge them into a single file?

[metasim]

Just realized I should add the setters too. Not enough coffee this morning...

[lnicola]

Good idea, I was actually wondering if there's any way to set it. Might make sense to use a larger value then, like 2^62.

[metasim]

Can you resample those to 1x1 and maybe merge them into a single file?

How about a 1x2 so we can have a data value and a no-data value?

[metasim]

Good idea, I was actually wondering if there's any way to set it. Might make sense to use a larger value then, like 2^62.

I basically neglected to see these

• https://gdal.org/api/gdalrasterband_cpp.html#_CPPv4N14GDALRasterBand21SetNoDataValueAsInt64E7int64_t
• https://gdal.org/api/gdalrasterband_cpp.html#_CPPv4N14GDALRasterBand22SetNoDataValueAsUInt64E8uint64_t

[lnicola]

Doesn't seem necessary to me, but sure it doesn't matter. Could come in handy in the future, who knows?

[metasim]

Doesn't seem necessary to me...

What are you referring to here? The comment sequence is confusing.

[lnicola]

I meant that about the second pixel with a valid value. I don't think it's needed to test these functions, but they could be useful in a simple warping/resampling test.

[lnicola]

Please squash at the end!

[lnicola]

:facepalm:

EDIT: nvm, my bad.