How do people feel about the above? I'm not against them (and at this point we don't even know whether there's ML-assisted code in our codebase), but at a minimum there are IP and license issues to be considered when copilot / ChatGPT / whatever comes next are used to contribute code.
A prudent and low-friction first step would be an additional PR checkbox stating e.g. "This contribution used ML assistance" (please feel free to bikeshed). Checking the box could indicate that follow-up questions are required regarding the nature of the ML contribution, if a maintainer deems it necessary.
I'm also very happy to discuss the addition of more explicit guidance for contributors if people feel it's useful.
How do people feel about the above? I'm not against them (and at this point we don't even know whether there's ML-assisted code in our codebase), but at a minimum there are IP and license issues to be considered when copilot / ChatGPT / whatever comes next are used to contribute code.
A prudent and low-friction first step would be an additional PR checkbox stating e.g. "This contribution used ML assistance" (please feel free to bikeshed). Checking the box could indicate that follow-up questions are required regarding the nature of the ML contribution, if a maintainer deems it necessary.
I'm also very happy to discuss the addition of more explicit guidance for contributors if people feel it's useful.