Closed JeromeSchmied closed 3 months ago
Care to open a PR with some benchmarks?On Jul 13, 2024, at 10:03, JeromeSchmied @.***> wrote: quick-xml is said to be a lot faster (about 50 times) than xml-rs. Why not use that one instead?
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
I'll see what I can do.
Nah, it's too much I can't do it.
The whole quick-xml
thing is just totally different, it's barely using anything else than Cow
s, and therefore doesn't have Iterator
implemented on stuff, that xml-rs
has, for example.
quick-xml
is said to be a lot faster (about 50 times) thanxml-rs
. Why not use that one instead?