[x] I added an entry to CHANGES.md if knowledge of this change could be valuable to users.
[x] I ran cargo fmt
Draft because it's based on #94. Please review that first.
Note that this isn't a performance change. It's about (hopefully) making
the library easier to use.
This is a corollary to https://github.com/georust/wkt/pull/89, but for
reading WKT, rather than writing. As we discussed there, probably there
is no reason for the user to care about the Wkt struct.
Note that the intermediate representation is still used (for now!), but
the user is no longer required to interact with it.
The road is open though for having a direct translation from Wkt text to
the geo-types (or whatever) represenation (see geozero for inspiration).
I also added the missing GeometryCollection::from(wkt) implementation to make this work for all geo-types.
michaelkirk
commented
2 years ago 
bors[bot]
CHANGES.mdif knowledge of this change could be valuable to users.[x] I ran cargo fmt
Draft because it's based on #94. Please review that first.
Note that this isn't a performance change. It's about (hopefully) making the library easier to use.
This is a corollary to https://github.com/georust/wkt/pull/89, but for reading WKT, rather than writing. As we discussed there, probably there is no reason for the user to care about the Wkt struct.
Note that the intermediate representation is still used (for now!), but the user is no longer required to interact with it.
The road is open though for having a direct translation from Wkt text to the geo-types (or whatever) represenation (see geozero for inspiration).
I also added the missing GeometryCollection::from(wkt) implementation to make this work for all geo-types.