Open helpyuan opened 4 months ago
Hi @helpyuan, the satellite overpass feature of GCHP may very well have a bug. We do not test it and are not aware of anyone using it. We will take a look at it as we have time.
Thanks @lizziel, looking forward to your good news.
@yantosca, just a random related question here. Does SatDiagn work for GCHP or just GC-Classic only? I read the lines here: https://github.com/geoschem/geos-chem/issues/770#issuecomment-872487010. It seems get_local_time function is not yet available in GCHP.
Together with this issue, does it mean currently we do not have satellite overpassing capability within GCHP or models other than GC-Classic?
@yuanjianz: The SatDiagn and SatDiagnEdge only work for GC-Classic. All of the diagnostic capability of GCHP is handled by the MAPL History component.
I know there was interest in having the similar output in MAPL but I'm not sure where that stands. @lizziel is our MAPL guru.
@yuanjianz, the satellite overpass capability of GCHP is restricted to the output along a track. If there is a currently a bug there then we will need to fix it. This is not currently a priority for version 14.5 so it is currently not being worked on.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If there are no updates within 7 days it will be closed. You can add the "never stale" tag to prevent the issue from closing this issue.
Closing due to inactivity
I am reopening this issue since it would be good to investigate at some point.
Your name
liumy
Your affiliation
CAMS
Please provide a clear and concise description of your question or discussion topic.
Hi all,
I have been using
track_file
to sample the model results recently (https://gchp.readthedocs.io/en/dev/supplement/satellite-overpass.html#output-along-a-track).# Question 1: GCHP has output the corresponding file, but there seems to be a slight issue with the latitude and longitude inside, as shown in the figure:
The above result is to set rcycle_track to True (
SpeciesSample.recycle_track: .true.
). But when I set recycle_track to.false.
(SpeciesSample.recycle_track: .false.
), meaning I don't want to reuse a track_file (if I understand correctly), it seems that no sampling was done, and the output result is shown in the figure (the time dimension is zero):So is this a bug? Or is there a problem with my track file? Here are my files: HISTORY.rc.txt trackfile_test_only_latlontime_20190701.txt
# Question 2: Following the above, when I set track_file to '
trackfile_test_only_latlontime_%y4%m2%d2.nc
' and recycle_track to.false.
, GCHP doesn't seem to be recognized. So I would like to ask if it is possible to read different track_file based on the date during a simulation process?It seems that it is not possible to upload netCDF files here. If you need my track_file, I can provide it to you through email or other ways.
version
GCHP-14.4.1