Open ktravis213 opened 10 months ago
@yantosca, @msulprizio, and @viral211 pointed me to the current capabilities. Right now
FAC = max(SSA / (SSA + NO3), .1)
JscaleNIT
to that FAC
. When JscaleNIT = 100
(the default), this is consistent with Viral's paper EF = max(100 * SSA / (SSA + NO3), 10)
.[2] The JscaleNIT
and JscaleNITs
are read from the yaml file, which allows the user to scale the whole range together (e.g., 10 to 100 or 5 to 50 or 100 to 1000).
Is this what you were asking for? Or were you asking to scale the min and max independently?
[1] https://github.com/geoschem/geos-chem/blob/dev/14.2.1/GeosCore/photolysis_mod.F90#L667-L688 [2] https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023
I forgot to mentions that the JscaleNIT
(and JscaleNITs
) can be traced back via hvAerNIT_JNIT
(and hvAerNIT_JNITs
) to the yaml file variable NIT_Jscale_JHNO2
(and NITs_Jscale_JHNO3
) in the photolyze_nitrate_aerosol
subsection of the yaml.[1]
Both the NIT and NITs species photolyze to NO2 and HNO2, so I am a little confused by the name of the scaling parameter for NITs (NITs_Jscale_JHNO3
).
I would defer to @viral211 as for the naming scheme. I believe the YAML tags are the same names as in the code.
I agree with @barronh, that the names of the YAML tags are confusing. It would be better to call them NITs_Jscale
and NIT_Jscale
since they are mapped to Input_Opt%hvAerNIT_JNITs
and Input_Opt%hvAerNIT_JNIT
in the code.
Thanks @viral211 and @barronh. I can make a feature request to change those for 14.3.0. Simple update but we should do it in a feature version and not a bugfix version.
@barronh @ktravis213: Is this issue now resolved?
@yantosca I see the change in the run https://github.com/geoschem/geos-chem/tree/main/run/GCClassic/geoschem_config.yml.templates, so I suspect that it is. I haven't run this version, but I assume it works.
Name and Institution (Required)
Name: Katie Travis Institution: NASA Langley
New GEOS-Chem feature or discussion
Request to add in a min and max scaling factor in the geoschem_input.yml for calculating the frequency of particulate nitrate photolysis. This will allow users to easily adjust the rate in remote and urban locations without having to recompile the model, in a similar manner as is currently done for HO2 uptake, another uncertain process. This was discussed at the GCSC meeting on 9/19 with @barronh