Open jinlx opened 5 months ago
Thanks for writing @jinlx. I think I see the problem. The entries for CEDS are within the NEI2016_MONMEAN section, which is turned off:
# Industrial (biofuel), other fuel-types are not considred due to a lack of emission information, 75% of the total will not be considered
# Check if cat and hier is right
0 CEDS_GBDMAPS_FUR_bIND $ROOT/CEDS/v2020-08/2017/CO-em-solid-biofuel_CEDS_2017.nc CO_ind 2017-2022/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s FUR 26/700/3002/1007 1 50
0 CEDS_GBDMAPS_FURFUR_bIND $ROOT/CEDS/v2020-08/2017/CO-em-solid-biofuel_CEDS_2017.nc CO_ind 2017-2022/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s FURFUR 26/701/3002/1007 1 50
)))NEI2016_MONMEAN
Also the HUMAN_BODY
and CIGARETTES
emissions are switched off in your HEMCO_Config.rc
.
Thanks for checking the code Bob! I should have described it in more details. I should also have pointed that the HUMAN_BODY and CIGARETTES are waiting for testing and thus being turned off. The anthropogenic emission is doing well and it is set to CEDS_GBDMAPS_byFuelType for this 4x5 simulation.
I was trying to test if GC is having the building emission of furfural I newly added. Here is following edition I did for HEMCO_Config.
# ----- BUILDING EMISSIONS ----------------------------------------------------
# This is population based, same method can be applied to VCP and others
--> BUILDING : true # 2020
'''
(((BUILDING
0 BUILDING $ROOT/LJ_popluation/Population_based_emission_flux_2020.nc Furfural_Building 2020/1/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s FURFUR - 15 1
)))BUILDING
Corresponding editions have been also made for HEMCO_Diagn.rc
###############################################################################
##### FURFUR emissions #####
###############################################################################
EmisFURFUR_Total FURFUR -1 -1 -1 3 kg/m2/s FURFUR_emission_flux_from_all_sectors
EmisFURFUR_BioBurn FURFUR 111 -1 -1 2 kg/m2/s FURFUR_emission_flux_from_biomass_burning
EmisFURFUR_Anthro FURFUR 0 1 -1 3 kg/m2/s FURFUR_emission_flux_from_anthropogenic
EmisFURFUR_Building FURFUR 0 15 -1 3 kg/m2/s FURFUR_emission_flux_from_building_emissions
The simultion goes well however the values of EmisFURFUR_Building in the diag output are not right (all 0 values). It seems that GC is reading the emission input data (suggested by the GC.log) but somehow not calculate it right. Do you have any insights on what may cause the 0 values output when adding a new emission inventory?
Thanks, Lixu
Hi @jinlx. Thanks for the clarification. Sorry if I wasn't clear before. I think you need to move the FURFUR entries CEDS_GBDMAPS_FUR_bIND and CEDS_GBDMAPS_FURFUR_bIND to this section of the HEMCO_Config.rc file:
#==============================================================================
# --- CEDS GBD-MAPS ---
#
# NOTES:
# -- Reference: McDuffie et al. (2020, Earth System Science Data)
# -- Anthropogenic source sectors: agriculture, energy, industry, road transport,
# non-road/off-road transport, residential, commercial, other energy use,
# solvents, waste, international shipping
# -- Fuel categories: the combustion of total coal, solid biofuel, liquid oil
# and gas, and all remaining sources
# **To use, enable CEDS_byFuelType and CEDS_SHIP_byFuelType**
#==============================================================================
(((CEDS_GBDMAPS
>>>include $ROOT/CEDS/v2020-08/HEMCO_Config.CEDS_GBDMAPS.rc
)))CEDS_GBDMAPS
(((CEDS_GBDMAPS_byFuelType
(((.not.CEDS_GBDMAPS
(((.not.CEDSv2
>>>include $ROOT/CEDS/v2020-08/HEMCO_Config.CEDS_GBDMAPS_byFuelType.rc
# Industrial (biofuel), other fuel-types are not considred due to a lack of emission information, 75% of the total will not be considered
# Check if cat and hier is right
0 CEDS_GBDMAPS_FUR_bIND $ROOT/CEDS/v2020-08/2017/CO-em-solid-biofuel_CEDS_2017.nc CO_ind 2017-2022/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s FUR 26/700/3002/1007 1 50
0 CEDS_GBDMAPS_FURFUR_bIND $ROOT/CEDS/v2020-08/2017/CO-em-solid-biofuel_CEDS_2017.nc CO_ind 2017-2022/1-12/1/0 C xy kg/m2/s FURFUR 26/701/3002/1007 1 50
))).not.CEDSv2
))).not.CEDS_GBDMAPS
)))CEDS_GBDMAPS_byFuelType
Otherwise I think HEMCO will not see the these entries.
Thanks for the suggestions Bob! Any insights on that the building emission is not caculated right?
@jinlx, the only thing that I can see is that the container name is BUILDING
but that is also the name of the brackets (((BUILDING
and )))BUILDING
. Try changing the container name to BULDING_FURFUR
or something like that.
Also have you turned on the Verbose: true
output? That should give you a lot of output and you should see if the building emissions are being picked up by the diagnostics.
Thanks Bob! After updating the container name and turn on the Verbose, I can confirm that the new emission datat is read by GEOS-Chem. The GC thinks the all values in the input netcdf are 0 or negative (snippet provided). However the input data does have resonable values through a quick ncdump check. The full GC log and the corresponding netcdf data is attached. Do you happen to know any scenarios that HEMCO will process the input data as 0 values like this?
Register_Base: Checking BUILDING_FURFUR
...
-->Source file : $ROOT/LJ_popluation/Population_based_emission_flux_2020.nc
-->ncRead? T
-->Source parameter: Furfural_Building
-->SpaceDim : 2
-->Array dimension : 0 0
-->Array sum : 0.00000000
-->Array min & max : 0.00000000 0.00000000
...
-->Species name : FURFUR
-->HEMCO species ID: 71
-->Category : 15
-->Hierarchy : 1
Container BUILDING_FURFUR
-->Source file : $ROOT/LJ_popluation/Population_based_emission_flux_2020.nc
-->ncRead? T
-->Source parameter: Furfural_Building
-->SpaceDim : 2
-->Array dimension : 72 46
-->Array sum
: -3.16802201E+34
-->Array min & max : -9.99999985E+30 0.00000000
-->Concentration? F
-->Species name : FURFUR
Emssion input: Building_emission.zip GC log: GClog.zip
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If there are no updates within 7 days it will be closed. You can add the "never stale" tag to prevent the Stale bot from closing this issue.
Closing out this issue
Can you run isCoards
on the file and provide the output here?
Name and Institution (Required)
Name: Lixu Jin Institution: University of Montana
Description of your issue or question
I am trying to update a population-based building emission inventory for a newly added compound, i.e., FURFUR, in the GC14.2.3. The data has been tested by the isCoards script and the results are provided below.
I have set up corresponding setting in HEMCO config and diagn files and the data is read as suggested by log file. However, the diagn file suggests 0 values. I am not sure how to resolve it and any suggestions are appreciated! Both config and diag files are attached just in case. Thanks!
isCoards results:
Below goes relative configuration for config and diag files. HEMCO_Config.txt
HEMCO_Diagn.txt