Closed aaime closed 5 years ago
In particular (mail quotes and comments):
am trying to make sense of some of the TileMatrixSets @ http://maps.geo-solutions.it/geoserver/vtp/gwc/service/wmts?request=GetCapabilities
<TileMatrixSet>
<ows:Identifier>EPSG:4326_512</ows:Identifier>
<ows:SupportedCRS>urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326</ows:SupportedCRS>
<TileMatrix><ows:Identifier>EPSG:4326:0</ows:Identifier>
<ScaleDenominator>2.795411320143589E8</ScaleDenominator>
<TopLeftCorner>-180.0 270.0</TopLeftCorner>
...
<TileMatrixSet>
<ows:Identifier>EPSG:4326</ows:Identifier>
<ows:SupportedCRS>urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326</ows:SupportedCRS>
<TileMatrix><ows:Identifier>EPSG:4326:0</ows:Identifier>
<ScaleDenominator>2.795411320143589E8</ScaleDenominator>
<TopLeftCorner>90.0 -180.0</TopLeftCorner>
It seems that these two (EPSG:4326 vs. EPSG:4326_512) define the TopLeftCorner in a flipped way? Could it be that the 512 version is wrong? Both specify the same supported CRS, and we normally interpret the top left corner to be lat, lon when that is either 'EPSG:4326' or 'urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326'.
The above must be verified, might be bug or configuration...
Also, would it be possible for GeoServer to use the standardized MIME type to describe the Mapbox vector tiles format? ( application/vnd.mapbox-vector-tile )
This can be solved by changing the GeoServer vector tiles module, but we might want to keep the old format available for backwards compatibility (something to be discussed on the devel list I believe).
<TileMatrixSet>
<ows:Identifier>EPSG:900913</ows:Identifier>
<ows:SupportedCRS>urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::900913</ows:SupportedCRS>
I just realized that 900913 was GoogleMapsCompatible aka WebMercator. It would be nice also if the
was specified as it does match the GoogleMapsCompatible WKSS. Most of the other tiling schemes on your WMTS also are all WKSS and could have such an identifier.
This can be addressed as configuration, but we might also raise the issue on the GWC list and have GWC use the well known scale sets from the WMTS specification by default instead of these old ones.
PR sent and merged
2.14 & 2.13 backports needed.
@fernandor777 shouldn't this one be in progress?
@aaime should we really backport to 2.13 and 2.14?
It is an actual bug, anyone setting up a custom gridset in a geographic CRS has axis flipped in the caps document
cool
Backports PRs sent
See list, some complaints about grid description, CRS being used, mime type being used.