Closed mbastian closed 1 year ago
@jacomyma @duncdrum @paulgirard @gvegayon @eduramiba @Yomguithereal
Any objections or suggestions? Thx
I don't have much experience with specifications licencing, but I took a quick look at diverse common specs online, it looks like the W3C uses its own The bulk of the text of this specification is also available in the WHATWG [Web Applications 1.0](http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html) specification, under a license that permits reuse of the specification text.
, the CSV RFC is only under copyright from ISOC, and the EU publishes specs under the EUPL. So I'd say there is no clear practice, but as a "document" rather than "data" or "software", Creative Commons sound to me like a good fit yes (then some could argue between BY or BY-SA but I guess it's a choice I don't have any reason to be part of).
CC-BY makes sense and is a good choice
+1, CC-BY seems appropriate to me.
good to me too
I agree; this license looks good to me too.
Excellent, thanks all for your input. I'll make the change
I realised we don't specifically mention a license in this repository.
I suggest https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ but I'm open for suggestions