Open gerasimou opened 3 years ago
Thank you for pointing this out. Now I'll probably have to rewrite my model a bit. 😅
There have been some ongoing updates, including in the parser, (not yet in the public version), so if you have any particular constructs or commands that cause issues and could be added, please let me know.
Hey @gerasimou,
there is nothing new from me here. After switching from boolean variables to int [0..1], Evochecker now works. I was very happy that formulas were not affected.
formula s1_needs_probing = (s1_latest_probe = s1_latest_probe_max) | (s1_knowledge = 1);
[start_UAC] uac_s = 0 & successful_invocation = 0 & ! s1_needs_probing & s2_needs_probing ...
Many thanks and all the best. I'm looking forward to the new version when it comes out.
The following model cannot be parsed by EvoChecker parser
the following errors are produced line 9:5 no viable alternative at input 'false' line 9:18 no viable alternative at input 'true' line 11:14 no viable alternative at input '&(b|!' line 11:14 no viable alternative at input '!' line 12:14 no viable alternative at input '&(b&!' line 12:14 no viable alternative at input '!' line 13:14 no viable alternative at input '&(b&!' line 13:14 no viable alternative at input '!'