This follows the treatment of the 0-based index --> 1-based name convention, e.g. in the 0th position being named P0001.zarr, but it's prone to misinterpretation particularly when considering the time/frame field and the channel one especially. Favor making this 0-based.
This follows the treatment of the 0-based index --> 1-based name convention, e.g. in the 0th position being named P0001.zarr, but it's prone to misinterpretation particularly when considering the time/frame field and the channel one especially. Favor making this 0-based.