Open germainelee02 opened 1 year ago
This FunctionalityBug is rejected. The tester's claim "In your UG, you did not put in the constraint that the index should be a positive integer too (1, 2, 3)." is incorrect, as this constraint is clearly stated in "Notes about the command format" under the "Features", as shown in the below screenshot.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
When I type in 'edit 0', it returns this error message instead of saying that the index provided is not valid. In your UG, you did not put in the constraint that the index should be a positive integer too (1, 2, 3).
This can lead the user to think that 'edit' is not a correct error message, and lead him to be very confused.