Closed garyvdm closed 3 years ago
Hello, yes I agree with you. It's due to NextHandler protocol definition. If we remove call like item=item in implementation, I think that test should pass. I will open this way on another branch of code.
I've released a new version 1.0.4, this one avoid calls with on_next(item=item) , let me known if i miss something
Jerome
Awesome. TYVM
Subject
callson_next(item=item)
which breaks if the argument name for youron_next
method is notitem
. It would be nice to be able to call the argument anything, so that you can describe what it is, so that the code is more readable. This was not the case for a few other observables that I tested.To Reproduce