Closed steverpalmer closed 8 years ago
For example, I commented out several test suites in the runtests.fth file, and then ran the tests and got the following output...
---------------------------
Error Report
Word Set Errors
---------------------------
Core -
Core extension -
Double number -
Exception -
Facility -
File-access -
Locals -
Memory-allocation 1
Programming-tools -
Search-order -
String -
---------------------------
Total 1
---------------------------
There is no indication that the Double number, Locals, Programming-tools and String tests where not run.
I think that is an excellent idea that we should implement. Are you volunteering to do it?
After running the tests, a summary report is generated which lists the numbers of faults found for each test suite. If no faults are found, then the summary line displays the test suite name and a "-". This is fine, but is also used to present the results for a test suite that has not been run. From a configuration management perspective, it would be better to display something different for those tests that have not been run. Perhaps "n/a"?