Closed Nipi closed 6 years ago
Strange. Is it possible to share (a subset of) the data you have, so I can see what's wrong? If so, send them to gert.janssenswillen@uhasselt.be. If not, I'll think of some tests you can do to find the problem.
In any case, thanks for highlighting these issues!
Hello Gert, I am sorry, but it is not possible to share a subset of data at the moment.
But I used this function with default type and it works well.... it seems to be a problem with type = performance ().
In addition, in the portion of graph that I removed from screenshot is possible to read the "actions". The rappresentation I obtained from processmapR is mixed: some nodes are actions and others are numbers...but I don't have numbers as activity_id in my data.
Thanks a lot!
Ok, thanks anyhow. I hope to find the problem very soon.
I made a separate branch to test some things. Can you install this version of processmapR (in a clean R session):
devtools::install_github("gertjanssenswillen/processmapR", ref = "process_map_dev")
and show me the results of the process_map function? It will be a list with 3 data.frames (without confidential information).
here you are, thanks 4 the support. You can find the same process map with default type and type = performance.
In your data, are there any missing values for the timestamp column?
Yes
Good, so I assume that's the problem. I will fix the code such that it can handle these missing values.
I pushed some fixes to the separate branch. Could you try if the result is improved now? (sorry I don't have an appropriate event log right now to test it myself)
I have pushed another fix which I think will solve the issues with the arcs.
The problem is solved! Thanks a lot!
Thanks to you for highlighting it! I will merge the branch back with the master branch.
Issue solved by pull request #6
Hi, Gert. I found that process_map function doesn't work well when type = perfomance().
Nodes are numbers instead of "actions" and the starting node seems to be a final node.