Open wooorm opened 4 years ago
Would it maybe make sense to include this in the tool itself, and propose a specific resource for each issue in the text? I feel like just adding a section to the readme and the website will not be as helpful because people might only use the tool itself without wanting to reading about it first. Also, I think a further reading section would either be too broad ( e.g. slave/master and white-listing are both examples of racist language but require different explanations as to why not to use them) or too specific (too many links/resources might deter readers). I would love to hear your opinion on this.
I realise of course this would require a lot more work, so I'd still like to help with assembling a list of resources.
Hi Effi!
We have some of that in the tool indeed: some urls and short descriptions with reasoning and a bit more explanation. We could use more of that though. And as they’re about specific words: also useful, but very specific.
The issue I want to solve here, is more of a broader explainer to educate folks in general about why language matters. Not lists of words to (not) use!
alex is currently explained as something that solves your language, whereas I hope to shift that more to: humans solve language, here’s a list of resources to learn more about why that’s important, and: use alex to help catch some stuff!
I can write a short blurb for the alex homepage, to get this started. I am planning to spend some time on open source/Hacktoberfest this upcoming Thursday. If anyone else wants to help out, let me know and we can collaborate!
That’s awesome! Thanks Jen! And indeed: looking for more folks who have suggestions or want to help!
@w-t-effi if you have time, it would be awesome if you could have a look at the PR, https://github.com/get-alex/alex/pull/306 and see if there's anything you would add or change. Thank you!
@jenweber yes, absolutely! I should find the time sometime next week.
Problem
Expected behaviour
The readme, and the website, should answer this information, perhaps in the form as a list of prereqs, that answer 1, and some form of further exercises, that answer 2.