Sourcery Code Quality Report

Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	2.12 ⭐	2.12 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	42.47 ⭐	42.47 ⭐	0.00
Working memory	6.88 🙂	6.88 🙂	0.00
Quality	84.19% ⭐	84.19% ⭐	0.00%

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	287	287	0

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
pytube/extract.py	84.19% ⭐	84.19% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
pytube/extract.py	apply_descrambler	5 ⭐	210 ⛔	20 ⛔	40.44% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
pytube/extract.py	apply_signature	11 🙂	111 🙂	14 😞	50.30% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
pytube/extract.py	PytubeHTMLParser.handle_starttag	7 ⭐	31 ⭐	10 😞	72.68% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
pytube/extract.py	video_info_url	0	32 ⭐	12 😞	75.78% ⭐	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.