Closed RajVarsani closed 2 years ago
super cool. how good is the webp support? (I am old :)) I think Safari does not support that well, does it?
(just to confirm: for png files you also have removed the meta data to make it smaller? (like something that https://tinypng.com/ and others do))
Safari supports WEBP since V14 ig.
Except for Internet Explorer and KaiOS Browser, all browsers seem to support it.
Regarding PNGs, I haven't optimized those as WEBPs were used on the site.
there are some pngs in the PR, no?
for Safari it says it only supports Big Sur or later and also mobile versions are only rather recent. I think a website should work on as much devices as possible, also old ones. (we actually have macOS users with old versions) can we have a fallback for those? or otherwise I'd rather use png - what is the big webp advantage?
@RajVarsani I merge this. but what do you think about my comment above?
Sorry, got a bit inactive because of studies stuff.
The major benefit of using WEBP over PNG is size only. Ig it has somewhat 25-30% lesser size for the same quality. And regarding the versions, Safari V14 is in macOS Mojave, too, So we'll be on the safe side, I suppose.
Changes
Updated Report: GETALBY_LIGHTHOUSE_REPORT_UPDATED.pdf
Test deploy: https://test-deploy.centralindia.cloudapp.azure.com/
VM configs:
SEO still has some scope for improvement. I'll go through that and update it here.
resolves #110