Closed kgilpin closed 3 weeks ago
The problem arises from an HTML-style comment being included within the Python code fences generated by Gemini. This inclusion results in invalid Python code because Python interpreters cannot process HTML-style comments. Consequently, the generated test case files become invalid and cannot be executed without errors.
The issue is caused by the presence of an HTML comment block that is supposed to denote the file path (metadata), which is being inadvertently included within Python code fences. This comment is not valid in Python and causes syntax errors when the code is executed or evaluated by any Python processing tool.
A viable solution is to ensure that any HTML comments are stripped out at the time of generating or processing the code block contents before they are integrated into the test case file output. By doing so, only legitimate Python code will form the body of the test case file.
Code Processing Function:
File Writing Logic:
# Update the logic responsible for extracting code within backticks and ensure:
# - Any HTML comment at the beginning of the code block is identified.
# - Remove these comments before the code is written to a `.py` file.
# The specific operation should iterate over each extracted line
# and exclude lines that match the HTML comment pattern.
Integration Points:
Validation and Testing:
By implementing these adjustments, the Gemini system will produce cleaner and executably valid test case files absent of improper HTML comments.
This is an example of a test case file generated by Gemini. You can see that it's including an HTML-style comment within the Python fences. The result is invalid Python code.
Within backticks:
When generating test case code, strip out any HTML comments from the beginning of the file, after extracting code from fences.