Closed PaulBGD closed 3 years ago
@PaulBGD Could you add a description?
I think we should just have a separate branch for the AMD form of the lib, like we do for the node (CommonJS) form.
Well, I think this is fine as it's a fairly trivial change. But I'm not really banking either way but would definitely prefer less branches.
if we we're going to make this change, we should just change to the standard UMD wrapper and do away with having a separate node branch, since UMD works in AMD, CommonJS, and browser.
Works with me.
We do away with the node branch and use the standard UMD wrapper (nodeAdapter?) in javascript branch and make a new node release (I say 1.0.1).
+1
Add supports to the JS version so we can use it with CommonJS.