Closed kristoffSC closed 2 years ago
File | Coverage [97.08%] | :green_apple: |
---|---|---|
ConfigException.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
JsonResultTableConverter.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
TokenParser.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
NameValuePair.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
CharArrayBuffer.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
HttpSinkWriter.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
URLEncodedUtils.java | 98.51% | :green_apple: |
URIBuilder.java | 93.24% | :green_apple: |
RestTablePollingClient.java | 89% | :green_apple: |
ParserCursor.java | 88.89% | :green_apple: |
Constants.java | 70% | :green_apple: |
Total Project Coverage | 96% | :green_apple: |
---|
File | Coverage [97.08%] | :green_apple: |
---|---|---|
ConfigException.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
JsonResultTableConverter.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
TokenParser.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
NameValuePair.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
CharArrayBuffer.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
HttpSinkWriter.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
URLEncodedUtils.java | 98.51% | :green_apple: |
URIBuilder.java | 93.24% | :green_apple: |
RestTablePollingClient.java | 89% | :green_apple: |
ParserCursor.java | 88.89% | :green_apple: |
Constants.java | 70% | :green_apple: |
Total Project Coverage | 96% | :green_apple: |
---|
File | Coverage [97.08%] | :green_apple: |
---|---|---|
ConfigException.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
JsonResultTableConverter.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
TokenParser.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
NameValuePair.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
CharArrayBuffer.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
HttpSinkWriter.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
URLEncodedUtils.java | 98.51% | :green_apple: |
URIBuilder.java | 93.24% | :green_apple: |
RestTablePollingClient.java | 89% | :green_apple: |
ParserCursor.java | 88.89% | :green_apple: |
Constants.java | 70% | :green_apple: |
Total Project Coverage | 96% | :green_apple: |
---|
In my opinion, it would be great to add information which parts of the original Apache code have been changed, as comments (apart from the obvious formatting/linter changes).
@swtwsk To be honest I've lost track of this. Two examples would be buildString() method and NameValuePair class which originally was an interface.
File | Coverage [97.25%] | :green_apple: |
---|---|---|
ConfigException.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
JsonResultTableConverter.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
TokenParser.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
NameValuePair.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
CharArrayBuffer.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
HttpSinkWriter.java | 100% | :green_apple: |
URLEncodedUtils.java | 98.51% | :green_apple: |
URIBuilder.java | 93.24% | :green_apple: |
RestTablePollingClient.java | 89% | :green_apple: |
ParserCursor.java | 88.89% | :green_apple: |
Total Project Coverage | 96.07% | :green_apple: |
---|
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Chmielewski krzysztof.chmielewski@getindata.com
Description
This PR removes dependency on
org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient
. This dependency was used by HTTP Lookup Source to build HTTP query. In fact we were using only this part from that library even though this library can act as a Http Client.The dependency in production code has been dropped (moved to test scope because it is expected by Wiremock).
Since there is no lightweight Java library that would provide functionality of httpclient UTIBuilder.class, the code for this class was copied and altered from
org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient
GitHub.The copied classes are marked with original Apache 2.0 licence and additional information about original source and fact that code have been changed by us was added to the licence description.
Classes are in
com.getindata.connectors.http.internal.utils.uri
package.The downside of this solution is that we had to include some complex code to our base code and add necessary test coverage for it.
The plus side is that we now dot have unnecessary libraries and classes in target jar that we were not able to exclude even with maven settings.
PR Checklist